Our Data Sources
89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in December 2013 and a single entry in the EPC database dated September 2013.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon, we estimate a market value of £610,743 and a rental value of £2,780 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £540,943 and £2,462 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon as measuring 632 m2.
That makes it the 21st largest plot in the postcode, where all 34 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of D. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 27 Sep 2013.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon completed on 11th December 2013 at £420,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 71.0% over the period since December 2013.
- Sold Dec 2013£420,000
- Sold Jun 1999£132,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2012 215 properties similar to 89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon have sold within a radius of 740 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 21st January 2026, was 11, Portnalls Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3DD, a freehold house which sold for £628,000.
Read more about house prices in CR5.
- Sold Jan 2026£628,000 | 4 Bed House11, Portnalls Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3DD11, Portnalls Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3DD
- Sold Dec 2025£555,000 | 4 Bed House428, Chipstead Valley Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3BJ428, Chipstead Valley Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3BJ
- Sold Dec 2025£612,500 | 4 Bed House346, Chipstead Valley Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3BF346, Chipstead Valley Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3BF
- Sold Dec 2025£570,000 | 4 Bed House18, Portnalls Close, Coulsdon, CR5 3DB18, Portnalls Close, Coulsdon, CR5 3DB
- Sold Mar 2025£615,500 | 4 Bed House66, Portnalls Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3DE66, Portnalls Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3DE
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £530,899, ranging from £412,471 to £653,769.
- 87 Rickman Hill
3 Bed House | 8 m | Est. Value: £449,642
- 93 Rickman Hill
4 Bed House | 20 m | Est. Value: £653,769
- 83 Rickman Hill
4 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £625,927
- 68 Rickman Hill
3 Bed House | 45 m | Est. Value: £497,709
- 74 Rickman Hill
4 Bed House | 46 m | Est. Value: £578,871
Location Comparison
Of the 128 addresses on Rickman Hill, Coulsdon, CR5, 89, Rickman Hill, Coulsdon comes out as the 27th largest and the 47th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £22k more expensive than the average property across the CR5 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- St Aidan's Catholic Primary School500 m away
- Chipstead Valley Primary School600 m away
- Smitham Primary School700 m away
- Woodcote High School1.9 km away
- Oasis Academy Coulsdon3.2 km away
- Oaks Park High School3.6 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Woodmansterne|500 m away
- Coulsdon South|1.0 km away
- Chipstead|1.3 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.
