Our Data Sources
5, Bells Lane, Rochester has no recent1 records in either the Land Registry or EPC database.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 5, Bells Lane, Rochester as measuring 421 m2.
That makes it the 9th largest plot in the postcode, where 34 of the 42 other houses have recorded plot data.
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 5, Bells Lane, Rochester completed on 7th February 2003 at £225,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
- Sold Feb 2003£225,000
- Sold Jan 1998£97,000
Properties Sold Nearby
Over the past 2 years 3 properties have sold within 640 metres of 5, Bells Lane, Rochester, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 24th June 2022, was Cuppes House, Bells Lane, Rochester, ME3 9HT, a freehold house which sold for £795,000.
Read more about house prices in ME3.
- Sold Jun 2022£795,000 | 5 Bed HouseCuppes House, Bells Lane, Rochester, ME3 9HTCuppes House, Bells Lane, Rochester, ME3 9HT
- Sold Apr 2019£575,000 | 5 Bed House7, Bells Lane, Rochester, ME3 9HT7, Bells Lane, Rochester, ME3 9HT
- Sold Sep 2014£105,000 | 2 Bed Flat2, Flack Gardens, Rochester, ME3 9AX2, Flack Gardens, Rochester, ME3 9AX
•Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- 600mHoo St Werburgh Primary School and the Marlborough
- 2.3kmSt Mary's Island Church of England (Aided) Primary School
- 2.5kmChattenden Primary School
- 2.9kmWaterfront UTC
- 4.3kmMaritime Academy
- 4.6kmBrompton Academy
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- 4.0kmGillingham (Kent)
- 5.2kmStrood (Kent)
- 5.4kmRochester
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast broadband is available in the area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated very low, based on Environment Agency data.







