Our Data Sources
61, Rayner Drive, Reading has 31 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in August 2012 and a single entry in the EPC database dated February 2026.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 61, Rayner Drive, Reading, we estimate a market value of £443,792 and a rental value of £2,226 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £393,073 and £1,972 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 61, Rayner Drive, Reading as measuring 174 m2.
That makes it the 44th largest plot in the postcode, where all 63 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
61, Rayner Drive, Reading has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 20 Feb 2026.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 61, Rayner Drive, Reading completed on 1st August 2012 at £277,500 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 3 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 51.6% over the period since August 2012.
- Sold Aug 2012£277,500
- Sold Jun 2004£229,950
- Sold Dec 2002£208,995
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2015 147 properties similar to 61, Rayner Drive, Reading have sold within a radius of 900 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 13th March 2025, was 17, Sheerlands Road, Reading, RG2 9ND, a leasehold house which sold for £220,000.
Read more about house prices in RG2.
- Sold Mar 2025£220,000 | 3 Bed House17, Sheerlands Road, Reading, RG2 9ND17, Sheerlands Road, Reading, RG2 9ND
- Sold Jan 2025£385,000 | 3 Bed House59, Howell Close, Reading, RG2 9GN59, Howell Close, Reading, RG2 9GN
- Sold Apr 2024£375,000 | 3 Bed House14, Howell Close, Reading, RG2 9QN14, Howell Close, Reading, RG2 9QN
- Sold Feb 2024£390,000 | 3 Bed House61, Poperinghe Way, Reading, RG2 9LW61, Poperinghe Way, Reading, RG2 9LW
- Sold Nov 2023£395,000 | 3 Bed House22, Bentley Drive, Reading, RG2 9FH22, Bentley Drive, Reading, RG2 9FH
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £420,693, ranging from £345,293 to £672,093.
- 63 Rayner Drive
3 Bed House | 8 m | Est. Value: £395,659
- 59 Rayner Drive
4 Bed House | 20 m | Est. Value: £672,093
- 58 Rayner Drive
3 Bed House | 23 m | Est. Value: £345,293
- 15 Attwood Drive
3 Bed House | 25 m | Est. Value: £427,813
- 60 Rayner Drive
3 Bed House | 25 m | Est. Value: £349,263
Location Comparison
Of the 63 addresses on Rayner Drive, Arborfield, Reading, RG2, 61, Rayner Drive, Reading comes out as the 39th largest and the 41st most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £53k more expensive than the average property across the RG2 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- The Coombes Church of England Primary School1.3 km away
- Farley Hill Primary School1.5 km away
- Gorse Ride Junior School3.1 km away
- Bohunt School Wokingham1.0 km away
- Oakbank School4.6 km away
- The Emmbrook School5.5 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Wokingham|5.3 km away
- Winnersh|5.4 km away
- Winnersh Triangle|5.9 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Internet coverage here is poor, based on recent Ofcom data, and connectivity may be weak or unavailable.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Slow or No Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












