Our Data Sources
52, Warren Hill, Rotherham has 31 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in August 2011 and a single entry in the EPC database dated August 2016.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 52, Warren Hill, Rotherham, we estimate a market value of £247,185 and a rental value of £1,188 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £218,935 and £1,052 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 52, Warren Hill, Rotherham as measuring 299 m2.
That makes it the 45th largest plot in the postcode, where 59 of the 60 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
52, Warren Hill, Rotherham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of D. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 31 Aug 2016.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 52, Warren Hill, Rotherham completed on 19th August 2011 at £105,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 3 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 24.7% over the period since August 2011.
- Sold Aug 2011£105,000
- Sold Jul 2011£115,000
- Sold Jun 2005£105,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2007 48 properties similar to 52, Warren Hill, Rotherham have sold within a radius of 530 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 1st May 2026, was 35, Watson Road, Rotherham, S61 1JS, a leasehold house which sold for £245,000.
Read more about house prices in S61.
- Sold May 2026£245,000 | 3 Bed House35, Watson Road, Rotherham, S61 1JS35, Watson Road, Rotherham, S61 1JS
- Sold Oct 2025£250,000 | 3 Bed House30, Fenton Fields, Rotherham, S61 3SU30, Fenton Fields, Rotherham, S61 3SU
- Sold Jul 2025£155,000 | 3 Bed House474, Wortley Road, Rotherham, S61 1JJ474, Wortley Road, Rotherham, S61 1JJ
- Sold Sep 2024£170,000 | 3 Bed House470, Wortley Road, Rotherham, S61 1JJ470, Wortley Road, Rotherham, S61 1JJ
- Sold Jul 2024£249,950 | 3 Bed HouseBarrick Mews, Benton Way, Rotherham, S61 1QDBarrick Mews, Benton Way, Rotherham, S61 1QD
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £207,050, ranging from £129,853 to £321,542.
- 51 Warren Hill
2 Bed House | 7 m | Est. Value: £193,984
- 50 Warren Hill
3 Bed House | 17 m | Est. Value: £233,881
- 55 Warren Hill
2 Bed House | 25 m | Est. Value: £195,690
- 57 Warren Hill
3 Bed House | 30 m | Est. Value: £213,232
- 48 Warren Hill
2 Bed House | 39 m | Est. Value: £199,063
Location Comparison
Of the 60 addresses on Warren Hill, Rotherham, S61, 52, Warren Hill, Rotherham comes out as the 20th largest and the 27th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £73k more expensive than the average property across the S61 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- St Bede's Catholic Primary School600 m away
- Kimberworth Community Primary School700 m away
- Redscope Primary School900 m away
- Winterhill School800 m away
- Wingfield Academy1.1 km away
- Clifton Community School3.3 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Rotherham Central|2.0 km away
- Meadowhall|3.0 km away
- Chapeltown (South Yorkshire)|5.7 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.
