Our Data Sources
37, Baddesley Close, Southampton has 3 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in May 2021 and a single entry in the EPC database dated December 2015.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 37, Baddesley Close, Southampton, we estimate a market value of £350,257 and a rental value of £1,510 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £310,227 and £1,337 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 37, Baddesley Close, Southampton as measuring 116 m2.
That makes it the 37th largest plot in the postcode, where 38 of the 57 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
37, Baddesley Close, Southampton has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of B. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 21 Dec 2015.
The property is not connected to mains gas and has high performance glazing. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 37, Baddesley Close, Southampton completed on 26th May 2021 at £274,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a leasehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 3 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 15.9% over the period since May 2021.
- Sold May 2021£274,000
- Sold May 2021£274,000
- Sold Dec 2015£244,995
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2016 126 properties similar to 37, Baddesley Close, Southampton have sold within a radius of 890 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 8th January 2026, was 51, Cedar Crescent, Southampton, SO52 9FU, a freehold house which sold for £371,000.
Read more about house prices in SO52.
- Sold Jan 2026£371,000 | 3 Bed House51, Cedar Crescent, Southampton, SO52 9FU51, Cedar Crescent, Southampton, SO52 9FU
- Sold Nov 2025£285,000 | 3 Bed House20, Cerne Close, Southampton, SO52 9GX20, Cerne Close, Southampton, SO52 9GX
- Sold Oct 2025£345,000 | 3 Bed House21, Street End, Southampton, SO52 9DY21, Street End, Southampton, SO52 9DY
- Sold Apr 2025£340,000 | 3 Bed House9, Linden Walk, Southampton, SO52 9DH9, Linden Walk, Southampton, SO52 9DH
- Sold Apr 2025£287,500 | 3 Bed House81, Cedar Crescent, Southampton, SO52 9FX81, Cedar Crescent, Southampton, SO52 9FX
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £386,161, ranging from £197,906 to £534,505.
- 36 Baddesley Close
3 Bed House | 5 m | Est. Value: £333,578
- 35 Baddesley Close
3 Bed House | 14 m | Est. Value: £416,924
- 34 Baddesley Close
4 Bed House | 17 m | Est. Value: £469,137
- 31 Baddesley Close
3 Bed House | 20 m | Est. Value: £416,924
- 32 Baddesley Close
4 Bed House | 25 m | Est. Value: £506,112
Location Comparison
Of the 65 addresses on Baddesley Close, North Baddesley, Southampton, SO52, 37, Baddesley Close, Southampton comes out as the 54th largest and the 55th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £137k less expensive than the average property across the SO52 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- North Baddesley Infant School1.0 km away
- North Baddesley Junior School1.0 km away
- Halterworth Primary School1.8 km away
- The Mountbatten School1.7 km away
- The Romsey School4.1 km away
- The Toynbee School5.0 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Romsey|3.5 km away
- Chandlers Ford|4.3 km away
- Swaythling|6.7 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












