Our Data Sources
29, Baddesley Close, Southampton has 2 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in December 2023 and a single entry in the EPC database dated November 2015.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 29, Baddesley Close, Southampton, we estimate a market value of £561,231 and a rental value of £2,077 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £497,090 and £1,840 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 29, Baddesley Close, Southampton as measuring 443 m2.
That makes it the 12th largest plot in the postcode, where 38 of the 57 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
29, Baddesley Close, Southampton has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of B. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 27 Nov 2015.
The property is not connected to mains gas and has high performance glazing. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 29, Baddesley Close, Southampton completed on 12th December 2023 at £588,750 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a leasehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 9.5% over the period since December 2023.
- Sold Dec 2023£588,750
- Sold Dec 2015£469,995
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2015 114 properties similar to 29, Baddesley Close, Southampton have sold within a radius of 890 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 4th February 2026, was 37, Rownhams Lane, Southampton, SO52 9HR, a freehold house which sold for £700,000.
Read more about house prices in SO52.
- Sold Feb 2026£700,000 | 4 Bed House37, Rownhams Lane, Southampton, SO52 9HR37, Rownhams Lane, Southampton, SO52 9HR
- Sold Sep 2025£548,000 | 4 Bed House1, St. Andrews Close, Southampton, SO52 9GJ1, St. Andrews Close, Southampton, SO52 9GJ
- Sold Jun 2025£515,000 | 4 Bed House12A, Street End, Southampton, SO52 9DY12A, Street End, Southampton, SO52 9DY
- Sold Mar 2025£485,000 | 4 Bed House18, Harris Way, Southampton, SO52 9PA18, Harris Way, Southampton, SO52 9PA
- Sold Feb 2025£605,000 | 4 Bed House7, Upper Crescent Road, Southampton, SO52 9JQ7, Upper Crescent Road, Southampton, SO52 9JQ
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £438,963, ranging from £333,578 to £549,988.
- 28 Baddesley Close
4 Bed House | 11 m | Est. Value: £534,505
- 30 Baddesley Close
4 Bed House | 13 m | Est. Value: £466,867
- 31 Baddesley Close
3 Bed House | 23 m | Est. Value: £416,924
- 32 Baddesley Close
4 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £506,112
- 27 Baddesley Close
3 Bed House | 32 m | Est. Value: £384,921
Location Comparison
Of the 65 addresses on Baddesley Close, North Baddesley, Southampton, SO52, 29, Baddesley Close, Southampton comes out as the 7th largest and the 7th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £64k more expensive than the average property across the SO52 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- North Baddesley Infant School1.0 km away
- North Baddesley Junior School1.0 km away
- Halterworth Primary School1.8 km away
- The Mountbatten School1.7 km away
- The Romsey School4.1 km away
- The Toynbee School5.0 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Romsey|3.5 km away
- Chandlers Ford|4.3 km away
- Swaythling|6.7 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












