Our Data Sources
9, Thomas Road, Southampton has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in June 2007 and a single entry in the EPC database dated January 2022.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 9, Thomas Road, Southampton, we estimate a market value of £293,202 and a rental value of £1,402 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £259,693 and £1,242 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 9, Thomas Road, Southampton as measuring 61 m2.
That makes it the 12th largest plot in the postcode, where 15 of the 28 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
9, Thomas Road, Southampton has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 17 Jan 2022.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 9, Thomas Road, Southampton completed on 22nd June 2007 at £179,950 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 92.7% over the period since June 2007.
- Sold Jun 2007£179,950
- Sold Sep 2005£138,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2007 131 properties similar to 9, Thomas Road, Southampton have sold within a radius of 560 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 26th March 2026, was 9, Church Close, Southampton, SO52 9ER, a freehold house which sold for £250,000.
Read more about house prices in SO52.
- Sold Mar 2026£250,000 | 3 Bed House9, Church Close, Southampton, SO52 9ER9, Church Close, Southampton, SO52 9ER
- Sold Mar 2026£345,000 | 3 Bed House58, Lavington Gardens, Southampton, SO52 9NR58, Lavington Gardens, Southampton, SO52 9NR
- Sold Mar 2026£290,000 | 3 Bed House31, Tottehale Close, Southampton, SO52 9NQ31, Tottehale Close, Southampton, SO52 9NQ
- Sold Feb 2026£345,000 | 3 Bed House6, Folland Close, Southampton, SO52 9PB6, Folland Close, Southampton, SO52 9PB
- Sold Dec 2025£306,000 | 3 Bed House8, Tanners Road, Southampton, SO52 9FD8, Tanners Road, Southampton, SO52 9FD
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £269,784, ranging from £176,941 to £426,850.
- 8 Thomas Road
3 Bed House | 4 m | Est. Value: £277,282
- 7 Thomas Road
3 Bed House | 10 m | Est. Value: £269,328
- 18 Chilcott Court
2 Bed Flat | 14 m | Est. Value: £176,941
- 6 Thomas Road
3 Bed House | 14 m | Est. Value: £277,282
- 10 Thomas Road
4 Bed House | 16 m | Est. Value: £414,727
Location Comparison
Of the 37 addresses on Thomas Road, North Baddesley, Southampton, SO52, 9, Thomas Road, Southampton comes out as the 28th largest and the 28th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £191k less expensive than the average property across the SO52 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- North Baddesley Junior School600 m away
- North Baddesley Infant School700 m away
- Halterworth Primary School2.3 km away
- The Mountbatten School1.9 km away
- The Romsey School4.5 km away
- Oasis Academy Lord's Hill4.6 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Romsey|3.9 km away
- Chandlers Ford|4.3 km away
- Swaythling|6.1 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












