Our Data Sources
89, Princess Way, Chorley has 31 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in September 2025 and a single entry in the EPC database dated June 2025.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 89, Princess Way, Chorley, we estimate a market value of £239,329 and a rental value of £1,163 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £211,977 and £1,030 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 89, Princess Way, Chorley as measuring 217 m2.
That makes it the 2nd largest plot in the postcode, where all 10 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
89, Princess Way, Chorley has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 12 Jun 2025.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 89, Princess Way, Chorley completed on 19th September 2025 at £235,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 3 times.
Values of comparable properties have dropped by 4.9% over the period since September 2025.
- Sold Sep 2025£235,000
- Sold Feb 1996£47,000
- Sold Sep 1995£49,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2015 206 properties similar to 89, Princess Way, Chorley have sold within a radius of 760 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 20th April 2026, was 32, Park Avenue, Chorley, PR7 6JQ, a freehold house which sold for £97,732.
Read more about house prices in PR7.
- Sold Apr 2026£97,732 | 3 Bed House32, Park Avenue, Chorley, PR7 6JQ32, Park Avenue, Chorley, PR7 6JQ
- Sold Jan 2026£183,000 | 3 Bed House91, Countess Way, Chorley, PR7 6PT91, Countess Way, Chorley, PR7 6PT
- Sold Dec 2025£222,000 | 3 Bed House88, Princess Way, Chorley, PR7 6PY88, Princess Way, Chorley, PR7 6PY
- Sold Nov 2025£210,000 | 3 Bed House6, Queensway, Chorley, PR7 6PW6, Queensway, Chorley, PR7 6PW
- Sold Jun 2025£222,000 | 3 Bed House63, Park Avenue, Chorley, PR7 6JQ63, Park Avenue, Chorley, PR7 6JQ
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £220,034, ranging from £192,921 to £250,160.
- 85 Princess Way
3 Bed House | 15 m | Est. Value: £243,034
- 83 Princess Way
3 Bed House | 20 m | Est. Value: £222,168
- 95 Princess Way
3 Bed House | 27 m | Est. Value: £221,592
- 10 Baronsway
3 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £199,315
- 6 Baronsway
3 Bed House | 30 m | Est. Value: £203,154
Location Comparison
Of the 114 addresses on Princess Way, Euxton, Chorley, PR7, 89, Princess Way, Chorley comes out as the 93rd largest and the 73rd most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £7k less expensive than the average property across the PR7 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Balshaw Lane Community Primary School500 m away
- Euxton Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School500 m away
- St. Mary's Catholic Primary School Euxton600 m away
- Parklands High School1.7 km away
- St Michael's Church of England High School2.2 km away
- Southlands High School2.8 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Euxton Balshaw Lane|800 m away
- Buckshaw Parkway|1.1 km away
- Chorley|3.0 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












