Our Data Sources
65, James Road, Kidderminster has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in October 2016 and a single entry in the EPC database dated August 2014.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 65, James Road, Kidderminster, we estimate a market value of £324,661 and a rental value of £1,313 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £287,557 and £1,163 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 65, James Road, Kidderminster as measuring 541 m2.
That makes it the 8th largest plot in the postcode, where 41 of the 53 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
65, James Road, Kidderminster has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of E. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 19 Aug 2014.
The property is not connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 65, James Road, Kidderminster completed on 28th October 2016 at £210,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 56.0% over the period since October 2016.
- Sold Oct 2016£210,000
- Sold Mar 1999£77,750
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2013 238 properties similar to 65, James Road, Kidderminster have sold within a radius of 650 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 2nd April 2026, was 5, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB, a freehold house which sold for £335,000.
Read more about house prices in DY10.
- Sold Apr 2026£335,000 | 4 Bed House5, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB5, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB
- Sold Feb 2026£287,500 | 3 Bed House9, James Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2TR9, James Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2TR
- Sold Sep 2025£300,000 | 3 Bed House72, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB72, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB
- Sold Jun 2025£290,000 | 3 Bed House82, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB82, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UB
- Sold May 2025£240,000 | 3 Bed House49, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UA49, Baldwin Road, Kidderminster, DY10 2UA
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £337,624, ranging from £293,008 to £377,699.
- 64 James Road
3 Bed House | 9 m | Est. Value: £293,008
- 4 James Road
4 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £372,177
- 5 James Road
3 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £306,496
- 62 James Road
4 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £334,678
- 7 James Road
4 Bed House | 39 m | Est. Value: £377,699
Location Comparison
Of the 69 addresses on James Road, Kidderminster, DY10, 65, James Road, Kidderminster comes out as the 33rd largest and the 39th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £41k more expensive than the average property across the DY10 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- St Oswald's CofE Primary School700 m away
- Offmore Primary School1.0 km away
- St George's CofE School1.0 km away
- King Charles I School1.6 km away
- Wolverley CofE Secondary School2.7 km away
- Baxter College3.0 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Kidderminster|1.6 km away
- Blakedown|3.7 km away
- Hagley|6.2 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.
