Our Data Sources
64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield has 41 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in March 2015 and a single entry in the EPC database dated August 2014.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield, we estimate a market value of £308,180 and a rental value of £1,102 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £272,959 and £976 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield as measuring 377 m2.
That makes it the 6th largest plot in the postcode, where 24 of the 25 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of D. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 06 Aug 2014.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield completed on 27th March 2015 at £217,500 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 4 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 43.3% over the period since March 2015.
- Sold Mar 2015£217,500
- Sold Aug 2002£100,000
- Sold Aug 1999£70,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2008 31 properties similar to 64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield have sold within a radius of 630 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 20th December 2024, was 1, Stonefield Avenue, Huddersfield, HD4 5QG, a freehold house which sold for £200,500.
Read more about house prices in HD4.
- Sold Dec 2024£200,500 | 3 Bed House1, Stonefield Avenue, Huddersfield, HD4 5QG1, Stonefield Avenue, Huddersfield, HD4 5QG
- Sold Nov 2024£161,500 | 3 Bed House57, Tom Lane, Huddersfield, HD4 5QQ57, Tom Lane, Huddersfield, HD4 5QQ
- Sold Apr 2024£320,000 | 3 Bed House11, Barton Manor Close, Huddersfield, HD4 5PE11, Barton Manor Close, Huddersfield, HD4 5PE
- Sold Oct 2023£307,000 | 3 Bed House14, Mason Court, Huddersfield, HD4 5NE14, Mason Court, Huddersfield, HD4 5NE
- Sold Jul 2023£280,000 | 3 Bed House2, Sandstone Lane, Huddersfield, HD4 5QN2, Sandstone Lane, Huddersfield, HD4 5QN
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £246,101, ranging from £184,050 to £340,708.
- 66 Tom Lane
4 Bed House | 16 m | Est. Value: £340,708
- 5 Stonefield Avenue
3 Bed House | 28 m | Est. Value: £273,161
- 68 Tom Lane
2 Bed House | 32 m | Est. Value: £221,914
- 57 Tom Lane
3 Bed House | 34 m | Est. Value: £289,914
- 55 Tom Lane
2 Bed House | 37 m | Est. Value: £222,757
Location Comparison
Of the 71 addresses on Tom Lane, Huddersfield, HD4, 64, Tom Lane, Huddersfield comes out as the 40th largest and the 11th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £111k more expensive than the average property across the HD4 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Oak CofE Primary School700 m away
- Woodside Green, A Share Primary Academy800 m away
- Beaumont Primary Academy1.0 km away
- Moor End Academy800 m away
- Royds Hall, A Share Academy1.3 km away
- Colne Valley High School1.8 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Lockwood|1.5 km away
- Berry Brow|2.4 km away
- Huddersfield|3.0 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












