Our Data Sources
54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock has a single entry in the Land Registry from June 2021 and a single entry in the EPC database dated March 2021.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock, we estimate a market value of £217,141 and a rental value of £1,255 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £192,325 and £1,112 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock as measuring 159 m2.
That makes it the 6th largest plot in the postcode, where 15 of the 16 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of E. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 12 Mar 2021.
The property is connected to mains gas and has partial double glazing. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock completed on 29th June 2021 at £180,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 this is the property's only sale.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 24.5% over the period since June 2021.
- Sold Jun 2021£180,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2013 95 properties similar to 54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock have sold within a radius of 1.1 kilometres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 18th December 2025, was 23, Daneacre Road, Radstock, BA3 3JS, a freehold house which sold for £219,000.
Read more about house prices in BA3.
- Sold Dec 2025£219,000 | 3 Bed House23, Daneacre Road, Radstock, BA3 3JS23, Daneacre Road, Radstock, BA3 3JS
- Sold May 2025£235,000 | 3 Bed House11, Stanley Terrace, Radstock, BA3 3HT11, Stanley Terrace, Radstock, BA3 3HT
- Sold Mar 2025£230,000 | 3 Bed House13, Waldegrave Terrace, Radstock, BA3 3EY13, Waldegrave Terrace, Radstock, BA3 3EY
- Sold Dec 2024£240,000 | 3 Bed House9, Frome Old Road, Radstock, BA3 3QE9, Frome Old Road, Radstock, BA3 3QE
- Sold Oct 2024£230,000 | 3 Bed House42, Springfield Buildings, Radstock, BA3 3JB42, Springfield Buildings, Radstock, BA3 3JB
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £228,078, ranging from £139,091 to £355,551.
- 55 Springfield Buildings
3 Bed House | 6 m | Est. Value: £203,902
- 56 Springfield Buildings
3 Bed House | 11 m | Est. Value: £219,417
- 57 Springfield Buildings
4 Bed House | 20 m | Est. Value: £254,392
- 36 Springfield Crest
2 Bed Flat | 21 m | Est. Value: £140,678
- 38 Springfield Crest
2 Bed Flat | 21 m | Est. Value: £139,091
Location Comparison
Of the 16 addresses on Springfield Buildings, Radstock, BA3, 54, Springfield Buildings, Radstock comes out as the 9th largest and the 10th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £119k less expensive than the average property across the BA3 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Trinity Church School200 m away
- St Nicholas Church School800 m away
- St Mary's Church of England Primary School1.5 km away
- Writhlington School1.4 km away
- Somerset Studio School1.5 km away
- Norton Hill Academy3.2 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Oldfield Park|10.1 km away
- Bath Spa|10.8 km away
- Freshford|11.1 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Internet coverage here is poor, based on recent Ofcom data, and connectivity may be weak or unavailable.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Slow or No Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












