51, Ham Shades Lane
51, Ham Shades Lane
Description & Estimates
51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable is recorded publicly as a mid-century freehold house across 926 ft2 of internal area, sitting on a 552 m2 plot.
Locally, houses of this size normally have 3 bedrooms with a garden.
Our estimate of the sale value of 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable is £454,502 and its rental estimate is £1,714 per month, given the available information and assuming reasonable condition.
Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable, CT5 falls within the CT5 postal district, in the borough of Canterbury.
Our Data Sources
51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable has 31 entries in the Land Registry , most recently in June 2009 and a single entry in the EPC database dated October 2008.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 1 out of 5 and is considered of low accuracy.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable, we estimate a market value of £477,227 and a rental value of £1,800 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £422,687 and £1,594 per month respectively.
Recent Market Change
Over the last year, 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable has seen its estimated sale value decrease by £8,624 (1.9%) and its estimated rental value grow by £42 per month (2.4%). This results in an estimated gross rental yield of 4.5%.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable as measuring 552 m2.
That makes it the 4th largest plot in the postcode, where all 6 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of D. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 27 Oct 2008.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using Boiler and radiators, mains gas.
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable completed on 5th June 2009 at £249,995 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 3 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 116.3% over the period since June 2009.
- Sold Jun 2009£249,995
- Sold Mar 2005£243,000
- Sold Nov 2003£185,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Over the past 2 years 3 properties similar to 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable have sold within a radius of 640 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 27th March 2023, was 65, Pier Avenue, Whitstable, CT5 2HJ, a freehold house which sold for £650,000.
Read more about house prices in CT5.
- Sold Mar 2023£650,000 | 3 Bed House65, Pier Avenue, Whitstable, CT5 2HJ65, Pier Avenue, Whitstable, CT5 2HJ
- Sold Feb 2021£380,000 | 3 Bed House35, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable, CT5 1NX35, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable, CT5 1NX
- Sold Sep 2016£304,000 | 3 Bed House122, Queens Road, Whitstable, CT5 2JL122, Queens Road, Whitstable, CT5 2JL
•Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Location Comparison
Of the 58 addresses on Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable, CT5, 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable comes out as the 52nd largest and the 49th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £29k more expensive than the average property across the CT5 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- 800mSt Mary's Catholic Primary School, Whitstable
- 800mSwalecliffe Community Primary School
- 1.3kmWestmeads Community Infant School
- 1.1kmThe Whitstable School
- 4.5kmHerne Bay High School
- 7.4kmThe Archbishop's School
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
From 51, Ham Shades Lane, Whitstable, the nearest station is Whitstable, 1.0 kilometres away.
- 1.0kmWhitstable
- 1.4kmChestfield & Swalecliffe
- 4.9kmHerne Bay
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated very low, based on Environment Agency data.
