Our Data Sources
39, Rose Street, Rochester has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in August 2015 and a single entry in the EPC database dated June 2020.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 39, Rose Street, Rochester, we estimate a market value of £242,034 and a rental value of £1,379 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £214,373 and £1,221 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 39, Rose Street, Rochester as measuring 80 m2.
That makes it the 29th largest plot in the postcode, where all 44 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
39, Rose Street, Rochester has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of D. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 09 Jun 2020.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 39, Rose Street, Rochester completed on 24th August 2015 at £147,500 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 84.8% over the period since August 2015.
- Sold Aug 2015£147,500
- Sold Apr 1997£33,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2021 286 properties similar to 39, Rose Street, Rochester have sold within a radius of 420 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 27th April 2026, was 11, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE, a freehold house which sold for £205,000.
Read more about house prices in ME1.
- Sold Apr 2026£205,000 | 3 Bed House11, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE11, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE
- Sold Mar 2026£200,000 | 3 Bed House120, Cecil Road, Rochester, ME1 2HP120, Cecil Road, Rochester, ME1 2HP
- Sold Mar 2026£238,000 | 3 Bed House23, Catherine Street, Rochester, ME1 2HJ23, Catherine Street, Rochester, ME1 2HJ
- Sold Feb 2026£223,000 | 3 Bed House8, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE8, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE
- Sold Jan 2026£217,500 | 3 Bed House13, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE13, Rose Street, Rochester, ME1 2EE
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £228,160, ranging from £210,450 to £247,315.
- 41 Rose Street
3 Bed House | 3 m | Est. Value: £230,509
- 37 Rose Street
3 Bed House | 5 m | Est. Value: £223,409
- 43 Rose Street
3 Bed House | 6 m | Est. Value: £210,450
- 45 Rose Street
3 Bed House | 9 m | Est. Value: £230,509
- 33 Rose Street
3 Bed House | 13 m | Est. Value: £229,708
Location Comparison
Of the 44 addresses on Rose Street, Rochester, ME1, 39, Rose Street, Rochester comes out as the 14th largest and the 14th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £102k less expensive than the average property across the ME1 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- St Peter's Infant School300 m away
- St Margaret's at Troy Town CofE Voluntary Controlled Primary School600 m away
- St William of Perth Roman Catholic Primary School800 m away
- Fort Pitt Grammar School500 m away
- St John Fisher Catholic Comprehensive School700 m away
- The Rochester Grammar School900 m away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Rochester|800 m away
- Chatham|1.0 km away
- Strood (Kent)|2.1 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












