Our Data Sources
38, Lockesfield Place has 31 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in November 2019 and a single entry in the EPC database dated April 2019.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 38, Lockesfield Place, we estimate a market value of £822,623 and a rental value of £4,552 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £728,609 and £4,032 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 38, Lockesfield Place as measuring 96 m2.
That makes it the 3rd largest plot in the postcode, where 5 of the 21 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
38, Lockesfield Place has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 04 Apr 2019.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 38, Lockesfield Place completed on 1st November 2019 at £776,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a leasehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 3 times.
Values of comparable properties have dropped by 4.9% over the period since November 2019.
- Sold Nov 2019£776,000
- Sold Jun 2003£345,000
- Sold Jun 1999£166,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2013 65 properties similar to 38, Lockesfield Place have sold within a radius of 340 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 10th April 2026, was 68, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AJ, a leasehold house which sold for £750,000.
Read more about house prices in E14.
- Sold Apr 2026£750,000 | 4 Bed House68, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AJ68, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AJ
- Sold Mar 2026£795,000 | 4 Bed House42, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AH42, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AH
- Sold Jan 2026£815,000 | 4 Bed House433, St. Davids Square, London, E14 3WH433, St. Davids Square, London, E14 3WH
- Sold Oct 2024£818,000 | 4 Bed House5, Wynan Road, London, E14 3AF5, Wynan Road, London, E14 3AF
- Sold Jul 2024£785,000 | 4 Bed House40, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AH40, Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AH
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £732,510, ranging from £574,567 to £842,731.
- 37 Lockesfield Place
4 Bed House | 6 m | Est. Value: £842,731
- 39 Lockesfield Place
4 Bed House | 6 m | Est. Value: £768,994
- 36 Lockesfield Place
4 Bed House | 11 m | Est. Value: £783,451
- 40 Lockesfield Place
4 Bed House | 11 m | Est. Value: £794,158
- 34 Lockesfield Place
4 Bed House | 12 m | Est. Value: £768,994
Location Comparison
Of the 84 addresses on Lockesfield Place, London, E14, 38, Lockesfield Place comes out as the 9th largest and the 10th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £306k more expensive than the average property across the E14 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Canary Wharf College, East Ferry200 m away
- Harbinger Primary School400 m away
- St Edmund's Catholic School700 m away
- George Green's School500 m away
- Canary Wharf College Crossharbour800 m away
- St Ursula's Convent School1.5 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Island Gardens|300 m away
- Mudchute|300 m away
- Cutty Sark for Maritime Greenwich|700 m away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












