Our Data Sources
32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester has 2 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in August 2019 and a single entry in the EPC database dated March 2014.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, we estimate a market value of £473,806 and a rental value of £1,922 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £419,656 and £1,702 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester as measuring 128 m2.
That makes it the 29th largest plot in the postcode, where 37 of the 39 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of B. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 14 Mar 2014.
The property is not connected to mains gas and has high performance glazing. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester completed on 30th August 2019 at £395,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 36.6% over the period since August 2019.
- Sold Aug 2019£395,000
- Sold Mar 2014£310,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2013 118 properties similar to 32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester have sold within a radius of 760 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 20th February 2026, was 30, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ, a freehold house which sold for £400,000.
Read more about house prices in GL7.
- Sold Feb 2026£400,000 | 3 Bed House30, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ30, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ
- Sold Oct 2025£425,000 | 3 Bed House1, Orpet Place, Cirencester, GL7 1JG1, Orpet Place, Cirencester, GL7 1JG
- Sold Aug 2023£395,000 | 3 Bed House7, Bennett Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HZ7, Bennett Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HZ
- Sold May 2023£437,000 | 4 Bed House23, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL23, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
- Sold Sep 2022£475,000 | 3 Bed House8, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL8, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £510,743, ranging from £370,167 to £692,663.
- 34 Matthews Walk
3 Bed House | 8 m | Est. Value: £451,243
- 30 Matthews Walk
4 Bed House | 9 m | Est. Value: £467,416
- 28 Matthews Walk
4 Bed House | 14 m | Est. Value: £467,416
- 26 Matthews Walk
4 Bed House | 22 m | Est. Value: £492,459
- 36 Matthews Walk
4 Bed House | 22 m | Est. Value: £494,496
Location Comparison
Of the 39 addresses on Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7, 32, Matthews Walk, Cirencester comes out as the 24th largest and the 24th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £42k less expensive than the average property across the GL7 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Watermoor Church of England Primary School700 m away
- Cirencester Primary School700 m away
- Siddington Church of England Primary School1.4 km away
- Cirencester Kingshill School900 m away
- Cirencester Deer Park School2.7 km away
- Farmor's School11.7 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Kemble|6.2 km away
- Stroud (Gloucs)|19.0 km away
- Swindon (Wilts)|19.6 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Internet coverage here is poor, based on recent Ofcom data, and connectivity may be weak or unavailable.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Slow or No Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












