Our Data Sources
32, King George Road, Chatham has 51 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in January 2025 and a single entry in the EPC database dated March 2023.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 32, King George Road, Chatham, we estimate a market value of £386,441 and a rental value of £1,698 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £342,276 and £1,504 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 32, King George Road, Chatham as measuring 417 m2.
That makes it the 23rd largest plot in the postcode, where 32 of the 34 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
32, King George Road, Chatham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of E. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 23 Mar 2023.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 32, King George Road, Chatham completed on 24th January 2025 at £350,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 5 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 1.7% over the period since January 2025.
- Sold Jan 2025£350,000
- Sold Dec 2010£240,000
- Sold May 2000£130,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2020 146 properties similar to 32, King George Road, Chatham have sold within a radius of 570 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 11th February 2026, was 19, Bleakwood Road, Chatham, ME5 0NF, a freehold house which sold for £375,000.
Read more about house prices in ME5.
- Sold Feb 2026£375,000 | 4 Bed House19, Bleakwood Road, Chatham, ME5 0NF19, Bleakwood Road, Chatham, ME5 0NF
- Sold Dec 2025£385,000 | 3 Bed House8, Meadow Close, Chatham, ME5 0UA8, Meadow Close, Chatham, ME5 0UA
- Sold Aug 2025£325,000 | 4 Bed House30, Harptree Drive, Chatham, ME5 0TH30, Harptree Drive, Chatham, ME5 0TH
- Sold May 2025£350,000 | 3 Bed House39, Meadow Close, Chatham, ME5 0UA39, Meadow Close, Chatham, ME5 0UA
- Sold Apr 2025£360,000 | 4 Bed House33, Bradfields Avenue, Chatham, ME5 0LE33, Bradfields Avenue, Chatham, ME5 0LE
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £395,589, ranging from £302,719 to £525,725.
- 28 King George Road
4 Bed House | 31 m | Est. Value: £404,020
- 17 King George Road
3 Bed House | 38 m | Est. Value: £342,842
- 15A King George Road
5 Bed House | 40 m | Est. Value: £525,725
- 38 King George Road
4 Bed House | 41 m | Est. Value: £443,662
- 15 King George Road
5 Bed House | 42 m | Est. Value: £522,176
Location Comparison
Of the 237 addresses on King George Road, Chatham, ME5, 32, King George Road, Chatham comes out as the 60th largest and the 56th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £51k more expensive than the average property across the ME5 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Oaklands School400 m away
- St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School400 m away
- Horsted Junior School600 m away
- Walderslade School300 m away
- Greenacre School300 m away
- Holcombe Grammar School1.8 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Chatham|3.4 km away
- Rochester|4.0 km away
- Gillingham (Kent)|4.6 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.
