Our Data Sources
29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in September 2023 and a single entry in the EPC database dated December 2016.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge, we estimate a market value of £487,114 and a rental value of £1,961 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £431,443 and £1,737 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge as measuring 249 m2.
That makes it the 15th largest plot in the postcode, where 22 of the 27 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of D. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 05 Dec 2016.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge completed on 1st September 2023 at £485,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have dropped by 6.2% over the period since September 2023.
- Sold Sep 2023£485,000
- Sold Dec 1998£105,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2011 157 properties similar to 29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge have sold within a radius of 2.9 kilometres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 24th April 2026, was 7, Spring Lane, Cambridge, CB25 9BL, a freehold house which sold for £425,000.
Read more about house prices in CB25.
- Sold Apr 2026£425,000 | 4 Bed House7, Spring Lane, Cambridge, CB25 9BL7, Spring Lane, Cambridge, CB25 9BL
- Sold May 2025£405,000 | 4 Bed House11, Spring Lane, Cambridge, CB25 9BL11, Spring Lane, Cambridge, CB25 9BL
- Sold May 2024£392,000 | 4 Bed House11, Trinity Close, Cambridge, CB25 9DE11, Trinity Close, Cambridge, CB25 9DE
- Sold Apr 2024£470,000 | 4 Bed House11, Maple Close, Cambridge, CB25 9BQ11, Maple Close, Cambridge, CB25 9BQ
- Sold Mar 2024£435,000 | 4 Bed House6, Maple Close, Cambridge, CB25 9BQ6, Maple Close, Cambridge, CB25 9BQ
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £471,422, ranging from £411,827 to £561,302.
- 8 Maple Close
4 Bed House | 25 m | Est. Value: £452,048
- 25 Cedar Walk
4 Bed House | 25 m | Est. Value: £455,020
- 10 Maple Close
4 Bed House | 38 m | Est. Value: £559,500
- 6 Maple Close
4 Bed House | 43 m | Est. Value: £445,477
- 20 Cedar Walk
3 Bed House | 50 m | Est. Value: £411,827
Location Comparison
Of the 27 addresses on Cedar Walk, Bottisham, Cambridge, CB25, 29, Cedar Walk, Cambridge comes out as the 16th largest and the 15th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £43k more expensive than the average property across the CB25 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Bottisham Community Primary School200 m away
- Swaffham Bulbeck Church of England Primary School2.0 km away
- Great Wilbraham CofE Primary Academy2.6 km away
- Bottisham Village College900 m away
- St Bede's Inter-Church School7.9 km away
- The Netherhall School8.3 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Waterbeach|6.6 km away
- Dullingham|7.2 km away
- Cambridge North|7.4 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












