Our Data Sources
20, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury has no recent1 records in either the Land Registry or EPC database.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 20, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury as measuring 188 m2.
That makes it the 25th largest plot in the postcode, where 50 of the 55 other houses have recorded plot data.
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 20, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury completed on 12th August 1999 at £79,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 this is the property's only sale.
- Sold Aug 1999£79,000
Properties Sold Nearby
Over the past 2 years 3 properties have sold within 790 metres of 20, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 21st August 2024, was 11, Rye Hill, Sudbury, CO10 2BB, a freehold house which sold for £412,500.
Read more about house prices in CO10.
- Sold Aug 2024£412,500 | 3 Bed House11, Rye Hill, Sudbury, CO10 2BB11, Rye Hill, Sudbury, CO10 2BB
- Sold May 2013£147,250 | 2 Bed House19, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury, CO10 2PL19, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury, CO10 2PL
- Sold Aug 2009£140,000 | 3 Bed House16, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury, CO10 2PL16, Betty Cocker Grove, Sudbury, CO10 2PL
•Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- 600mPot Kiln Primary School
- 1.3kmTudor Church of England Primary School, Sudbury
- 1.5kmWells Hall Primary School
- 1.4kmOrmiston Sudbury Academy
- 1.6kmThomas Gainsborough School
- 11.8kmStour Valley Community School
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- 900mSudbury (Suffolk)
- 7.7kmBures
- 12.6kmChappel & Wakes Colne
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast broadband is available in the area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated very low, based on Environment Agency data.







