Our Data Sources
2, Buckley Close, Chatham has a single entry in the Land Registry from October 2019 and a single entry in the EPC database dated May 2019.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 0 out of 5 and is considered of low accuracy.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 2, Buckley Close, Chatham as measuring 123 m2.
That makes it the 7th largest plot in the postcode, where 10 of the 12 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
2, Buckley Close, Chatham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of B. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 28 May 2019.
The property is not connected to mains gas and has high performance glazing. It is heated using electric underfloor heating.
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 2, Buckley Close, Chatham completed on 24th October 2019 at £97,500 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a leasehold house.
Since 1995 this is the property's only sale.
Values of comparable properties have dropped by 8.3% over the period since October 2019.
- Sold Oct 2019£97,500
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £337,674, ranging from £335,862 to £337,900.
- 41 Khartoum Parade
3 Bed House | 42 m | Est. Value: £335,862
- 43 Khartoum Parade
3 Bed House | 43 m | Est. Value: £337,900
- 39 Khartoum Parade
3 Bed House | 43 m | Est. Value: £337,900
- 37 Khartoum Parade
3 Bed House | 44 m | Est. Value: £337,900
- 35 Khartoum Parade
3 Bed House | 44 m | Est. Value: £337,900
Schools Nearby
- Brompton-Westbrook Primary School700 m away
- New Road Primary School1.3 km away
- St John's Church of England Infant School1.3 km away
- Brompton Academy1.2 km away
- Fort Pitt Grammar School1.4 km away
- St John Fisher Catholic Comprehensive School1.5 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Chatham|1.1 km away
- Rochester|1.2 km away
- Gillingham (Kent)|1.7 km away
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.
