Our Data Sources
195, Middle Lane, Rotherham has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in February 2018 and a single entry in the EPC database dated October 2009.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 1 out of 5 and is considered of low accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 195, Middle Lane, Rotherham, we estimate a market value of £166,526 and a rental value of £955 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £147,495 and £846 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 195, Middle Lane, Rotherham as measuring 189 m2.
That makes it the 5th largest plot in the postcode, where 8 of the 17 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
195, Middle Lane, Rotherham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 19 Oct 2009.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 195, Middle Lane, Rotherham completed on 22nd February 2018 at £108,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 67.6% over the period since February 2018.
- Sold Feb 2018£108,000
- Sold May 2006£113,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2018 113 properties similar to 195, Middle Lane, Rotherham have sold within a radius of 550 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 20th March 2026, was 31, Clifton Grove, Rotherham, S65 2AZ, a freehold house which sold for £122,000.
Read more about house prices in S65.
- Sold Mar 2026£122,000 | 3 Bed House31, Clifton Grove, Rotherham, S65 2AZ31, Clifton Grove, Rotherham, S65 2AZ
- Sold Feb 2026£139,000 | 3 Bed House16, Byron Drive, Rotherham, S65 2QD16, Byron Drive, Rotherham, S65 2QD
- Sold Sep 2025£93,333 | 3 Bed House10, Byron Drive, Rotherham, S65 2QD10, Byron Drive, Rotherham, S65 2QD
- Sold Aug 2025£144,500 | 3 Bed House56, Wordsworth Drive, Rotherham, S65 2QQ56, Wordsworth Drive, Rotherham, S65 2QQ
- Sold Feb 2025£131,000 | 3 Bed House65, Gilberthorpe Street, Rotherham, S65 2TL65, Gilberthorpe Street, Rotherham, S65 2TL
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £142,761, ranging from £102,118 to £166,522.
- 154 Gilberthorpe Street
3 Bed House | 12 m | Est. Value: £166,522
- 152 Gilberthorpe Street
3 Bed House | 18 m | Est. Value: £159,108
- 207 Middle Lane
3 Bed House | 36 m | Est. Value: £166,029
- 89 Clifton Avenue
3 Bed House | 36 m | Est. Value: £102,118
- 87 Clifton Avenue
3 Bed House | 37 m | Est. Value: £106,863
Location Comparison
Of the 69 addresses on Middle Lane, Rotherham, S65, 195, Middle Lane, Rotherham comes out as the 55th largest and the 33rd most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £3k less expensive than the average property across the S65 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Badsley Primary School600 m away
- East Dene Primary800 m away
- St Mary's Catholic Primary School900 m away
- Clifton Community School400 m away
- St Bernard's Catholic High School1.1 km away
- Oakwood High School1.6 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Rotherham Central|1.6 km away
- Meadowhall|5.3 km away
- Swinton (South Yorks)|6.6 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












