HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 18, Matthews Walk, Cirencester as measuring 139 m².

That makes it the 21st largest plot in the postcode, where 37 of the 39 other houses have recorded plot data.

18, Matthews Walk, Cirencester has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of B. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 08 Nov 2013.

The property is not connected to mains gas and has high performance glazing. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).

The most recent sale of 18, Matthews Walk, Cirencester completed on 20th December 2013 at £330,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.

Since 1995 this is the property's only sale.

Values of comparable properties have risen by 60.7% over the period since December 2013.

• Sold Dec 2013£330,000

Since 2013 72 properties similar to 18, Matthews Walk, Cirencester have sold within a radius of 720 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.

The latest, on the 26th March 2025, was 13, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL, a freehold house which sold for £451,000.

Read more about house prices in GL7.

• Sold Mar 2025£451,000 | 4 Bed House13, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL13, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Oct 2023£485,000 | 4 Bed House34, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ34, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ
• Sold Oct 2023£475,000 | 4 Bed House5, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL5, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Sep 2023£446,000 | 4 Bed House36, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL36, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold May 2023£437,000 | 4 Bed House23, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL23, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Sep 2022£440,000 | 4 Bed House25, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL25, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Sep 2022£450,000 | 4 Bed House28, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL28, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Jul 2021£385,000 | 4 Bed House43, Buncombe Way, Cirencester, GL7 1GZ43, Buncombe Way, Cirencester, GL7 1GZ
• Sold Jun 2021£545,000 | 4 Bed House4, Buncombe Way, Cirencester, GL7 1GZ4, Buncombe Way, Cirencester, GL7 1GZ
• Sold Jun 2021£510,000 | 4 Bed House4, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL4, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Nov 2017£433,300 | 4 Bed House26, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL26, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Sep 2017£418,000 | 4 Bed House24, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ24, Middle Mead, Cirencester, GL7 1GQ
• Sold Aug 2016£355,000 | 4 Bed House30, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL30, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Mar 2016£320,000 | 4 Bed House22, Buncombe Way, Cirencester, GL7 1GZ22, Buncombe Way, Cirencester, GL7 1GZ
• Sold Nov 2015£490,000 | 4 Bed House2, Clifford Close, Cirencester, GL7 1HP2, Clifford Close, Cirencester, GL7 1HP
• Sold Jun 2014£430,000 | 4 Bed House1, Bennett Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HZ1, Bennett Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HZ
• Sold Apr 2014£380,000 | 4 Bed House24, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL24, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Mar 2014£317,000 | 4 Bed House16, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL16, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Nov 2013£320,000 | 4 Bed House17, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL17, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL
• Sold Feb 2013£320,000 | 4 Bed House15, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL15, Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7 1HL

Of the 39 addresses on Matthews Walk, Cirencester, GL7, 18, Matthews Walk, Cirencester comes out as the 5th largest and the 5th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.

It is also £6k more expensive than the average property across the GL7 district.

• Watermoor Church of England Primary School

  700 m away
• Cirencester Primary School

  700 m away
• Siddington Church of England Primary School

  1.4 km away

• Cirencester Kingshill School

  900 m away
• Cirencester Deer Park School

  2.7 km away
• Farmor's School

  11.7 km away

• Kemble

  |

  6.2 km away
• Stroud (Gloucs)

  |

  19.0 km away
• Swindon (Wilts)

  |

  19.6 km away

The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.