HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 169, Claypit Lane, Rotherham as measuring 300 m².

That makes it the 9th largest plot in the postcode, where all 16 other houses have recorded plot data.

169, Claypit Lane, Rotherham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of E. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 12 Oct 2018.

The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).

The most recent sale of 169, Claypit Lane, Rotherham completed on 13th November 2018 at £57,500 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.

Since 1995 the property has sold twice.

Values of comparable properties have risen by 61.1% over the period since November 2018.

• Sold Nov 2018£57,500
• Sold Oct 1997£16,500

Since 2019 160 properties similar to 169, Claypit Lane, Rotherham have sold within a radius of 550 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.

The latest, on the 12th December 2025, was 213, Kilnhurst Road, Rotherham, S62 5LE, a leasehold house which sold for £153,201.

Read more about house prices in S62.

• Sold Dec 2025£153,201 | 3 Bed House213, Kilnhurst Road, Rotherham, S62 5LE213, Kilnhurst Road, Rotherham, S62 5LE
• Sold Nov 2025£160,000 | 3 Bed House181, Claypit Lane, Rotherham, S62 5JS181, Claypit Lane, Rotherham, S62 5JS
• Sold Nov 2025£165,000 | 3 Bed House8, Bennett Close, Rotherham, S62 5PE8, Bennett Close, Rotherham, S62 5PE
• Sold Nov 2025£170,000 | 3 Bed House8, Thackeray Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PN8, Thackeray Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PN
• Sold Aug 2025£145,000 | 3 Bed House221, Kilnhurst Road, Rotherham, S62 5LG221, Kilnhurst Road, Rotherham, S62 5LG
• Sold Jul 2025£175,000 | 3 Bed House18, Beech Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5HH18, Beech Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5HH
• Sold Oct 2024£115,000 | 3 Bed House69, Thrybergh Hall Road, Rotherham, S62 5LP69, Thrybergh Hall Road, Rotherham, S62 5LP
• Sold Aug 2024£115,000 | 3 Bed House28, Hawthorne Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5HJ28, Hawthorne Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5HJ
• Sold May 2024£167,000 | 3 Bed House3, St. Nicolas Road, Rotherham, S62 5ER3, St. Nicolas Road, Rotherham, S62 5ER
• Sold Feb 2024£120,000 | 3 Bed House29, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB29, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB
• Sold Jan 2024£127,000 | 3 Bed House53, The Bridleway, Rotherham, S62 5PY53, The Bridleway, Rotherham, S62 5PY
• Sold May 2023£114,000 | 3 Bed House33, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB33, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB
• Sold Apr 2023£153,000 | 3 Bed House37, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB37, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB
• Sold Jan 2023£120,000 | 3 Bed House55, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB55, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB
• Sold Nov 2022£140,000 | 3 Bed House41, The Bridleway, Rotherham, S62 5PY41, The Bridleway, Rotherham, S62 5PY
• Sold Aug 2021£105,000 | 3 Bed House28, Dickens Road, Rotherham, S62 5PL28, Dickens Road, Rotherham, S62 5PL
• Sold Mar 2021£115,000 | 3 Bed House53, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB53, Priestley Avenue, Rotherham, S62 5PB
• Sold Jan 2021£109,000 | 3 Bed House4, Bennett Close, Rotherham, S62 5PE4, Bennett Close, Rotherham, S62 5PE
• Sold Nov 2019£106,000 | 3 Bed House10, St. Nicolas Road, Rotherham, S62 5ER10, St. Nicolas Road, Rotherham, S62 5ER
• Sold Oct 2019£105,000 | 3 Bed House185, Claypit Lane, Rotherham, S62 5JS185, Claypit Lane, Rotherham, S62 5JS

Of the 160 addresses on Claypit Lane, Rawmarsh, Rotherham, S62, 169, Claypit Lane, Rotherham comes out as the 94th largest and the 52nd most expensive in our analysis of the public data.

It is also £8k less expensive than the average property across the S62 district.

• Rawmarsh Sandhill Primary School

  500 m away
• Rawmarsh Ryecroft Infant School

  500 m away
• Rawmarsh Rosehill Junior School

  700 m away

• Rawmarsh Community School

  1.4 km away
• Swinton Academy

  1.9 km away
• Thrybergh Academy

  2.6 km away

• Swinton (South Yorks)

  |

  2.6 km away
• Mexborough

  |

  3.8 km away
• Rotherham Central

  |

  4.4 km away

The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.