Our Data Sources
131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham has 41 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in November 2014 and a single entry in the EPC database dated October 2011.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 5 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham, we estimate a market value of £308,768 and a rental value of £1,269 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £273,480 and £1,124 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham as measuring 137 m2.
That makes it the 14th largest plot in the postcode, where 15 of the 17 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 12 Oct 2011.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham completed on 14th November 2014 at £170,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold 4 times.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 55.9% over the period since November 2014.
- Sold Nov 2014£170,000
- Sold Jul 2012£125,000
- Sold Jun 2002£92,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2013 130 properties similar to 131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham have sold within a radius of 670 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 10th March 2026, was 6, Trent Road, Chatham, ME5 8JH, a freehold house which sold for £330,000.
Read more about house prices in ME5.
- Sold Mar 2026£330,000 | 3 Bed House6, Trent Road, Chatham, ME5 8JH6, Trent Road, Chatham, ME5 8JH
- Sold Mar 2026£265,000 | 3 Bed House89, Kingston Crescent, Chatham, ME5 8XG89, Kingston Crescent, Chatham, ME5 8XG
- Sold Feb 2026£280,000 | 3 Bed House46, Wittersham Close, Chatham, ME5 7NA46, Wittersham Close, Chatham, ME5 7NA
- Sold Oct 2025£233,000 | 3 Bed House4, Shepperton Close, Chatham, ME5 8RP4, Shepperton Close, Chatham, ME5 8RP
- Sold Aug 2025£280,000 | 3 Bed House14, Weybridge Close, Chatham, ME5 8RW14, Weybridge Close, Chatham, ME5 8RW
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £270,338, ranging from £222,813 to £312,799.
- 133 Kingston Crescent
3 Bed House | 9 m | Est. Value: £304,704
- 127 Kingston Crescent
3 Bed House | 13 m | Est. Value: £293,603
- 135 Kingston Crescent
3 Bed House | 14 m | Est. Value: £296,413
- 30 Weybridge Close
3 Bed House | 20 m | Est. Value: £255,711
- 28 Weybridge Close
3 Bed House | 24 m | Est. Value: £258,121
Location Comparison
Of the 213 addresses on Kingston Crescent, Chatham, ME5, 131, Kingston Crescent, Chatham comes out as the 128th largest and the 85th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £23k less expensive than the average property across the ME5 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Lordswood School700 m away
- Maundene School800 m away
- St Benedict's Catholic Primary School1.1 km away
- Greenacre School1.2 km away
- Walderslade School1.4 km away
- The Victory Academy2.6 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Chatham|4.0 km away
- Gillingham (Kent)|4.5 km away
- Rochester|4.9 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.
