Our Data Sources
10, Tudor Park, Amersham has 21 entries in the Land Registry, most recently in February 2020 and a single entry in the EPC database dated October 2019.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 4 out of 5 and is considered of high accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 10, Tudor Park, Amersham, we estimate a market value of £1,118,781 and a rental value of £3,074 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £990,920 and £2,723 per month respectively.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 10, Tudor Park, Amersham as measuring 519 m2.
That makes it the 4th largest plot in the postcode, where 11 of the 12 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
10, Tudor Park, Amersham has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of C. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 14 Oct 2019.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using a boiler and radiators (mains gas).
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 10, Tudor Park, Amersham completed on 10th February 2020 at £1,020,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 the property has sold twice.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 26.0% over the period since February 2020.
- Sold Feb 2020£1,020,000
- Sold Jan 2000£455,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Since 2019 105 properties similar to 10, Tudor Park, Amersham have sold within a radius of 680 metres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 20th May 2026, was 16, Woodside Close, Amersham, HP6 5EG, a freehold house which sold for £1,000,000.
Read more about house prices in HP6.
- Sold May 2026£1,000,000 | 4 Bed House16, Woodside Close, Amersham, HP6 5EG16, Woodside Close, Amersham, HP6 5EG
- Sold Sep 2025£1,085,000 | 4 Bed House27, Grimsdells Lane, Amersham, HP6 6HF27, Grimsdells Lane, Amersham, HP6 6HF
- Sold Sep 2025£1,000,000 | 4 Bed House26A, Highfield Close, Amersham, HP6 6HG26A, Highfield Close, Amersham, HP6 6HG
- Sold Mar 2025£1,050,000 | 4 Bed House2, Grimsdells Lane, Amersham, HP6 6HE2, Grimsdells Lane, Amersham, HP6 6HE
- Sold Sep 2024£1,075,000 | 4 Bed House23, Lollards Close, Amersham, HP6 5JL23, Lollards Close, Amersham, HP6 5JL
Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Explore Nearby Properties
The surrounding properties have an average estimated value of £748,358, ranging from £317,888 to £1,280,069.
- 11 Tudor Park
4 Bed House | 17 m | Est. Value: £1,071,345
- 9 Tudor Park
4 Bed House | 23 m | Est. Value: £1,179,179
- 12 Tudor Park
4 Bed House | 30 m | Est. Value: £1,100,232
- Flat 4, Midsummer Lodge 30 Rickmansworth Road
2 Bed Flat | 40 m | Est. Value: £317,888
- Flat 6, Midsummer Lodge 30 Rickmansworth Road
2 Bed Flat | 40 m | Est. Value: £402,276
Location Comparison
Of the 20 addresses on Tudor Park, Amersham, HP6, 10, Tudor Park, Amersham comes out as the 11th largest and the 11th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £244k more expensive than the average property across the HP6 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- Chestnut Lane School600 m away
- Elangeni School700 m away
- Woodside Junior School900 m away
- Dr Challoner's Grammar School500 m away
- Amersham School1.6 km away
- Dr Challoner's High School2.8 km away
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- Amersham|600 m away
- Chesham|2.9 km away
- Chalfont & Latimer|3.3 km away
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast Broadband available in this area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated Very Low, based on Environment Agency data.












