35, Harris Lane
35, Harris Lane
Description & Estimates







35, Harris Lane, Radlett is recorded publicly as a mid-century freehold house across 975 ft2 of internal area, sitting on a 255 m2 plot.
Locally, houses of this size normally have 3 bedrooms with a garden.
Our estimate of the sale value of 35, Harris Lane, Radlett is £596,490 and its rental estimate is £2,619 per month, given the available information and assuming reasonable condition.
Harris Lane, Shenley, Radlett, WD7 falls within the WD7 postal district, in the borough of Hertsmere.
Our Data Sources
35, Harris Lane, Radlett has a single entry in the Land Registry from December 2010 and a single entry in the EPC database dated June 2009.
We combine this information with that of neighbouring properties to estimate the property attributes and values.
The local information is scored as 3 out of 5 and is considered of medium accuracy.
Price Range & Condition
The condition of a property plays an important role in determining its value, with the degree of impact varying by property type, size and location.
For 35, Harris Lane, Radlett, we estimate a market value of £626,314 and a rental value of £2,749 per month when presented in very good decorative order. Should the property require extensive cosmetic improvement, those figures would reduce to £554,735 and £2,435 per month respectively.
Recent Market Change
Over the last year, 35, Harris Lane, Radlett has seen its estimated sale value fall by £2,584 (0.4%) and its estimated rental value move up by £87 per month (3.3%). This results in an estimated gross rental yield of 5.3%.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 35, Harris Lane, Radlett as measuring 255 m2.
That makes it the 3rd largest plot in the postcode, where all 6 other houses have recorded plot data.
Energy Efficiency
35, Harris Lane, Radlett has an Energy Performance Rating (EPC) of E. This is based on the most recent assessment, dated 11 Jun 2009.
The property is connected to mains gas and has fully double glazed windows. It is heated using Boiler and radiators, mains gas.
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 35, Harris Lane, Radlett completed on 10th December 2010 at £280,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 this is the property's only sale.
Values of comparable properties have risen by 60.3% over the period since December 2010.
- Sold Dec 2010£280,000
Similar Properties Sold Nearby
Over the past 2 years 3 properties similar to 35, Harris Lane, Radlett have sold within a radius of 2.0 kilometres, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 3rd December 2024, was 2, Birchwood, Radlett, WD7 9ET, a freehold house which sold for £485,000.
Read more about house prices in WD7.
•Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Properties Let Nearby
Over the past 2 years our Estate Agent network has recorded 1 let within 2.0 kilometres of 35, Harris Lane, Radlett.
The latest, in June 2025, was 13, Redwood Rise, Borehamwood, WD6 5LB, a freehold house let by Robert Lewis Property.
•Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
Location Comparison
Of the 41 addresses on Harris Lane, Shenley, Radlett, WD7, 35, Harris Lane, Radlett comes out as the 34th largest and the 37th most expensive in our analysis of the public data.
It is also £15k less expensive than the average property across the WD7 district.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- 200mShenley Primary School
- 1.7kmClore Shalom School
- 2.3kmNewberries Primary School
- 2.8kmHertswood Academy
- 3.6kmElstree Screen Arts Academy
- 4.1kmYavneh College
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
From 35, Harris Lane, Radlett, the nearest station is Radlett, 2.8 kilometres away.
- 2.8kmRadlett
- 4.2kmElstree & Borehamwood
- 5.5kmHow Wood (Hertfordshire)
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches superfast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Superfast broadband is available in the area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated very low, based on Environment Agency data.

