Our Data Sources
34, Salisbury Park, Liverpool has no recent1 records in either the Land Registry or EPC database.
The local information is scored as 1 out of 5 and is considered of low accuracy.
1Sales dated prior to 2007 are shown, but are not used in our calculations.
Plot Size
HM Land Registry records the plot of land for 34, Salisbury Park, Liverpool as measuring 565 m2.
That makes it the 9th largest plot in the postcode, where all 61 other houses have recorded plot data.
Sold Prices
The most recent sale of 34, Salisbury Park, Liverpool completed on 1st June 1998 at £173,000 and was recorded by HM Land Registry as a freehold house.
Since 1995 this is the property's only sale.
- Sold Jun 1998£173,000
Properties Sold Nearby
Over the past 2 years 3 properties have sold within 680 metres of 34, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, per the Land Registry and our network of Estate Agents.
The latest, on the 2nd September 2011, was 33, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT, a freehold house which sold for £249,950.
Read more about house prices in L16.
- Sold Sep 2011£249,950 | 3 Bed House33, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT33, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT
- Sold Apr 2011£300,000 | 3 Bed House32, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT32, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT
- Sold Jun 2010£337,500 | 4 Bed House37, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT37, Salisbury Park, Liverpool, L16 0JT
•Nearby is defined as the radius comprising the nearest 2,000 addresses.
More reading links
Schools Nearby
- 100mChildwall Church of England Primary School
- 700mOur Lady's Bishop Eton Catholic Primary School
- 1.1kmRudston Primary School
- 900mSt Francis Xavier's Catholic Academy
- 1.0kmCalderstones School
- 1.1kmKing David High School
More reading links
Public Transport Nearby
- 1.9kmBroad Green
- 2.1kmMossley Hill
- 2.5kmWest Allerton
Available Internet Speeds
Broadband here reaches ultrafast speeds, based on recent Ofcom data.
According to recent data from Ofcom, Ultrafast broadband is available in the area.
Risk of Flooding
The flood risk here is rated very low, based on Environment Agency data.







